<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Pedestrians, cyclists motorists are trying to kill you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingtreads.com/2011/09/20/attention-pedestrians-cyclists-motorists-are-trying-to-kill-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingtreads.com/2011/09/20/attention-pedestrians-cyclists-motorists-are-trying-to-kill-you/</link>
	<description>Everything bicycles, thoughts, rides, product reviews and events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 23:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jym Dyer</title>
		<link>http://talkingtreads.com/2011/09/20/attention-pedestrians-cyclists-motorists-are-trying-to-kill-you/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jym Dyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtreads.com/?p=2169#comment-904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[• The study fails to normalize its stats with the walking population at large, so all demographic details are meaningless.  There is also no data on who&#039;s at fault in these collisions, something that could be normalized with actuarial data.  That would be imperfect, but would at least be better than the conclusions the Gruskin Foundation would have us leap to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>• The study fails to normalize its stats with the walking population at large, so all demographic details are meaningless.  There is also no data on who&#8217;s at fault in these collisions, something that could be normalized with actuarial data.  That would be imperfect, but would at least be better than the conclusions the Gruskin Foundation would have us leap to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
